Trending

Retired judge joins lawsuit against LA utility after losing Palisades home

Jay Gandhi, who oversaw Camp Fire settlement, sues Los Angeles Department of Water and Power over lack of water

Retired Judge Joins Suit Versus LA Utility After Losing Home
Listen to this article
00:00
1x

Key Points

AI Generated.
This summary is reviewed by TRD Staff.

  • Retired Judge Jay Gandhi, who oversaw wildfire settlements, has joined a lawsuit against the LADWP after losing his home in the Pacific Palisades fire.
  • The lawsuit alleges the LADWP failed to ensure adequate water supply and didn't implement a public safety power shutoff during a red-flag warning, contributing to the fire's devastation.
  • Gov. Gavin Newsom has ordered an independent investigation into the LADWP's management of the water system, and the utility defends its actions, citing legal precedent and adherence to fire codes.

A retired federal judge who oversaw a $1 billion settlement for some of the state’s largest wildfires has joined a lawsuit against the nation’s largest public utility providing water and power after losing his home in the Pacific Palisades.

Jay Gandhi, who served as a mediator between cities and Pacific Gas & Electric after the Camp, Butte and North Bay fires, joined the complaint against the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the Los Angeles Daily News reported.

Gandhi and his family lost their home in the Palisades fire in early January. 

He joins a suit filed on Jan. 13, which now represents more than 750 fire plaintiffs. U.S. District Court Judge Dean Pregerson, who also lost his home in the fire, joined the lawsuit as well.

Gandhi is focused on getting the city to take accountability for his family, neighbors and friends affected by the Pacific Palisades fire, which burned 5,000 homes, businesses and more.

“It was a sense of security and safety that went up in smoke on Jan. 7,” Gandhi said while announcing his participation in the lawsuit in front of his charred property.

The suit focuses on the lack of water in the Palisades, alleging that two reservoirs key to public use in the area were not full. 

It claims that the LADWP left overhead power lines energized, instead of doing a public safety shutoff, which other major utility companies in the state do during red-flag warnings. A red flag warning was in place at the time of the Palisades fire.

“With these reservoirs out of commission, hydrants in Pacific Palisades failed after three (3) tanks each holding one million gallons of water went dry within a span of 12 hours,” the complaint reads.

Sign Up for the undefined Newsletter

LADWP officials pushed back on the allegations, saying the utility’s systems were well managed.

“It is expected to see plaintiffs joining lawsuits at this early stage to preserve their claims,” a statement from the utility said.

“However, long-settled law and precedent prevent water utilities, and their rate payers, from being liable for wildfire losses,” it said. “Fire codes and regulators determine the capacity of public water systems to fight fires, and LADWP’s system exceeded those standards.”

LADWP attorneys from Munger, Tolles & Olson are relying on a 1911 California Supreme Court decision to defend the utility against multiple lawsuits blaming LADWP for running out of water to fight the blaze. Simply put, attorneys argue, the utility didn’t have a contract to provide the water.

Calling the lack of water “deeply troubling,” Gov. Gavin Newsom has ordered an independent investigation into the LADWP’s management of the reservoir and water system.

Gandhi said he believes that the fire was preventable and that the trial could be a “piecemeal” part of restitution for those who lost homes, businesses or both in the Palisades fire. There is precedent for holding a water board responsible for wildfire damage, he said.  

“The city must stand up and claim responsibility and do right by the residents of the Palisades. And that’s why I joined this battle,” he said.

Gandhi served for eight years as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Central District of California, the nation’s largest federal court. Before the bench, he was a partner at the Paul Hastings law firm, based in Century City. In 2019, he presided over the $1 billion settlement involving PG&E and 14 local governments.

Dana Bartholomew

Read more

Two Lawsuits Allege Cali Insurers Colluded on Fire Coverage
Residential
Los Angeles
Insurers in crosshairs of two lawsuits over collusion in fire coverage
Commercial
Los Angeles
Tariff uncertainty clouds LA wildfire rebuild efforts
Residential
Los Angeles
City Council looks to take Measure ULA funds for wildfire aid
Recommended For You