Trending

Habitat Co. sues Chicago Housing Authority over lead poisoning missteps

Real estate firm alleges CHA failed to defend it in court, reneged on key legal protections in case that led to $24M payout

Habitat Sues Chicago Housing Authority Over Lead Poisoning Missteps
CHA’s Angela Hurlock and Habitat Co.’s Matthew Fiascone (Facebook, Habitat Co.)
Listen to this article
00:00
1x

Key Points

AI Generated.
This summary is reviewed by TRD Staff.

  • Habitat Co. is suing the Chicago Housing Authority for breach of contract and legal malpractice in a lead poisoning case.
  • Habitat alleges CHA failed to disclose a conflict of interest, provided damaging testimony against them, and reneged on an agreement to indemnify Habitat.
  • The lawsuit follows a court order for CHA to pay over $24 million to families of poisoned children and coincides with a leadership shakeup at CHA.

Fallout from the Chicago Housing Authority’s lead poisoning disaster isn’t over.

Chicago-based developer and multifamily landlord Habitat Company, which was formerly a property manager for the CHA, filed a lawsuit against the agency and two of its attorneys, alleging breach of contract and legal malpractice in how they handled the high-profile lead poisoning case, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Habitat claims the agency failed to disclose a conflict of interest but also called witnesses who gave “damaging” testimony against Habitat — despite CHA legally representing them at the time. The firm argues the agency acted in bad faith, ultimately leaving Habitat to fend for itself. 

The developer’s lawsuit follows a Cook County judge ordering the CHA to pay over $24 million to the families of the poisoned children in January, resolving a separate case brought against the agency. Habitat managed the property at 7715 North Marshfield Avenue from 2016 to 2019, and East Lake Management Group from 2019 to 2022. Both were cleared of liability.

Habitat, which managed 3,400 public housing units for the CHA before severing ties last year, now says the agency’s mismanagement of the trial played a direct role in its decision to end its decades-long relationship with the housing authority. CHA was aware of the lead-based paint on the property since 2001 but failed to disclose its presence to Habitat before and during Habitat’s management, the new suit says.

Sign Up for the undefined Newsletter

The firm alleges CHA went back on an agreement to indemnify Habitat in the case, forcing it to take on costly legal fees and significant liability exposure. Habitat seeks damages to recover legal fees and other costs related to CHA’s alleged mishandling of the case.

The new lawsuit lands as CHA is undergoing a broader leadership shakeup and a commitment to “rebuild trust” made last week by its interim CEO Angela Hurlock. Several top executives have departed in recent months, including one termination. Employees complained about former general council Ellen Harris’ leadership, including alleged instances of public berating, burnout and inflexible work schedules.

Harris resigned in August, while CHA’s former senior director of asset management was terminated in September, according to internal documents retrieved by the newspaper. Hurlock was tapped as interim CEO in October, to replace former head Tracey Scott.

And CHA’s former chief operating officer Eric Garrett and former deputy chief of building operations Ellen Sargent both resigned Jan. 3. Former treasurer Shiwei Zhou resigned Dec. 31.

— Judah Duke

Read more

Chicago Housing Authority Knew of Lead Paint, Children Injured
Residential
Chicago
Chicago Housing Authority ordered to pay $24M in lead paint case
Chicago Housing Authority’s Woes Include “Toxic” Work Culture
Politics
Chicago
Internal documents reveal housing authority’s “toxic” culture
Politics
Chicago
Habitat Co breaks up with CHA over insurance obligation, miscommunication
Recommended For You